[cdr-discuss] Three RFCs

[Leslie P. Polzer]

> Also, changes in implementations have been known to contain bugs,
> hence by forcing the changes to be to cl:case, we are going to
> potentially affect existing code bases, for no discernible gain.

That's why regression tests exist...


> Which brings me to another question I've been meaning to bring up
> w.r.t. the latest CDRs:  Would it be sensible to have a defined
> package for these kinds of smallish extensions (like e.g. the index
> types, as well), maybe cdr-cl or ext-cl, or whatever?  Has this been
> discussed already?

Sounds sensible to me, yes.

  Leslie