[Bese-devel] ucw_public

[Marco Baringer]

Aleksandar Bakic <a_bakic at yahoo.com> writes:

>> there is no policy as to what you should, or shouldn't, do to
>> that repo (wild wild coding).
>
> I was going to suggest the opposite: how about trying to plan the ucw
> development (maybe using bugzilla)? It seems to be quite a movable target for
> some uses. Will there be any changes to the way arnesi_dev and ucw_dev are
> handled?

i wasn't planning on it. it's not that i wouldn't like ucw and arnesi
to be stable repos (instead of just "old") and leave _dev as the
acutal development repos, but i really don't have the time to deal
with it. if anyone feels liking deciding when ucw is stable (fsov
"stable") and moving that into ucw (and arnesi) and tagging it i'll
give whatever support (write perms, support, etc.)  is neccessary.

-- 
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
	-Leonard Cohen