[Bese-devel] Would it be very difficult to make both arnesi and yaclml asdf installable

[Luca Capello]

Hello!

On Wed 23 Nov 2005 13:28 +0100, Ignas Mikalajunas wrote:
>> >   I know that making UCW itself asdf installable would not make much
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > sense - UCW can't operate witohout a backend, but having at least
>> > yaclml installable separately would be kind of nice for those who are
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > using (or at least trying to use) it without UCW.
>>
>> Maybe you suffered of the YACLML bug I reported here [1], which is now
>> corrected [2].
[...]
> Well this bug was a kludge, but asdf-installable is a bit different
> from "having an asdf definition".
> You can find more info here:
>
>   http://www.cliki.net/asdf-install

I missunderstood what you meant, sorry, probably because I read "asdf
installable" as "able to be loaded by ASDF".

I already know what ASDF-install is, anyway thank you for the
clarification ;-)

> I am really sorry for not asking the permission, yet since no one
[...]
> Hope no one minds.

/me not at all :-D

THx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/attachments/20051123/6e563951/attachment.sig>