System cleanup
Robert Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.info
Fri Mar 19 14:51:39 UTC 2021
Didier, would you mind posting a GitLab issue for this? It's feasible,
but I'm so overloaded right now that there's no chance I will get to it
before I forget.
Thanks
On 19 Mar 2021, at 8:34, Didier Verna wrote:
> François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
>
>> Before it can be ignored, it must be defined. And so as to define it,
>> its class must be defined. I suppose we could have some error class
>> that it used when the class it not defined, that would only trigger
>> an
>> error at runtime if the feature is true. I'm sure the current / next
>> sucker^W maintainer will accept patches.
>
> Not a big deal. I just thought that since everything in that form
> are
> keywords (so no read-time problem, as opposed to parsing
> sb-grovel:grovel-constants-file), perhaps the intended behavior was
> different.
>
> So in the end, it seems that there's very little (if at all) to be
> gained by using :if-feature to conditionalize on implementation
> type.
>
> --
> ¡En Seguida! -- New album:
> https://www.didierverna.com/records/en-seguida.php
> Available on all digital platforms now!
>
> Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list