Rejiggering the branches

[Phoebe Goldman]

I prefer dev over main, since it’s more clear about the purpose of the branch. Main is just not a very descriptive word. For one thing, for most people, stable will actually be the “main” branch.

This isn’t a strong preference, but honestly I doubt anyone has that strong of feelings on the subject.

best,
phoebe

> On Jul 12, 2021, at 9:59 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:
> 
> As we move forward, and try to add some new facilities to ASDF, this seems like a good time to revise the branching structure that we use.
> 
> In particular, I would like to add a stable branch that will permit continuation of the 3.3 release series, the need for which is illustrated by Mark E's recent merge request.
> 
> If we are going to make that change, it seems like a good time to rename the master branch to either main or dev. Any preferences?
> 
> I'd like to have a quick discussion about this over the week, with an eye to getting a solution in place by Friday.
> 
> Thanks for your thoughts,
> 
> R
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20210712/e36d3a10/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20210712/e36d3a10/attachment.sig>