Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?
Robert P. Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.net
Sat Mar 17 14:38:08 UTC 2018
Sorry. That was meant to be "master," not matter.
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 09:36, Robert P. Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear: this is matter, right? It's not one of the syntax control branches?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Mar 17, 2018, at 07:51, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>> Results for these lisps:
>>
>> abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86
>> ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
>> ccl-1.11-r16635-f96-linux-x86
>> ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86
>> clisp-2.49-unix-x86
>> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-bytecode
>> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-lisp-to-c
>> sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
>> sbcl-1.3.21-linux-x86
>>
>> show no regressions.
>>
>> ACL tests are running - needed to re-run them because licence refresh was needed.
>>
>> The report: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-73.html
>>
>> Best regards,
>> - Anton
>>
>> 13.03.2018, 16:53, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
>>> I've started tests for 3.3.1.7
>>>
>>> 11.03.2018, 06:11, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>>> Dear Anton,
>>>>
>>>> can you try your test suite again against 3.3.1.7 ? I think we're
>>>> mostly ready to release 3.3.2 this time, with its many bugs fixes (and
>>>> bug fix fixes).
>>>>
>>>> Can you also try the branch made by Robert for syntax-control + a copy
>>>> of the standard readtable as default?
>>>>
>>>> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>>> Wir Mathematiker sind alle ein bisschen meschugge.
>>>> (We mathematicans are all a bit crazy). — Lev Landau
>>
>
>
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list