Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

[Robert P. Goldman]

Just to be clear: this is matter, right? It's not one of the syntax control branches?

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 17, 2018, at 07:51, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> Results for these lisps:
> 
> abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86
> ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
> ccl-1.11-r16635-f96-linux-x86
> ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86
> clisp-2.49-unix-x86
> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-bytecode
> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-lisp-to-c
> sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
> sbcl-1.3.21-linux-x86
> 
> show no regressions.
> 
> ACL tests are running - needed to re-run them because licence refresh was needed.
> 
> The report: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-73.html
> 
> Best regards,
> - Anton
> 
> 13.03.2018, 16:53, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
>> I've started tests for 3.3.1.7
>> 
>> 11.03.2018, 06:11, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>>  Dear Anton,
>>> 
>>>  can you try your test suite again against 3.3.1.7 ? I think we're
>>>  mostly ready to release 3.3.2 this time, with its many bugs fixes (and
>>>  bug fix fixes).
>>> 
>>>  Can you also try the branch made by Robert for syntax-control + a copy
>>>  of the standard readtable as default?
>>> 
>>>  —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>>  Wir Mathematiker sind alle ein bisschen meschugge.
>>>  (We mathematicans are all a bit crazy). — Lev Landau
>