Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

[Anton Vodonosov]

17.03.2018, 21:52, "Robert Goldman" <rpgoldman at sift.net>:
> Thank you very much, Anton. Question: is the inner-conditional-test
> failure on SBCL 1.3.21 not a regression? 

Not a regression. Heap Exhausted often happens on SBCL for that library:
https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/library/inner-conditional.html

That's a problem of SBCL's conservative garbage collector - it doesn't always
recognizes garbage that may be collected, thus exhausting heap.

>
> What about reversi on CCL 1.9? I guess if I understand correctly,
> reversi must have passed on CCL 1.10 and 1.11, so probably I shouldn't
> worry about this, either.

This error happens only with the presence of the new ASDF, but it's low-level
memory access level, thus it's, in any case, an error in CCL rather than
in ASDF lisp code. 

For the record, it's easy to reproduce this way (the failure happens about 80% of time): 

    $ rm -rf /home/testgrid/.cache/common-lisp/ && rlwrap /home/testgrid/lisps/ccl-1.9/lx86cl --no-init --load /home/testgrid/quicklisp-asdf3/setup.lisp --eval '(ql:quickload :reversi)' --eval '(ccl:quit)'


And it only happens in CCL 1.9. Since 1.10 the error doesn't reproduce.
So no worries for ASDF developers.


>
> On 17 Mar 2018, at 7:51, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
>
>>  Results for these lisps:
>>
>>  abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86
>>  ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
>>  ccl-1.11-r16635-f96-linux-x86
>>  ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86
>>  clisp-2.49-unix-x86
>>  ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-bytecode
>>  ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-lisp-to-c
>>  sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
>>  sbcl-1.3.21-linux-x86
>>
>>  show no regressions.
>>
>>  ACL tests are running - needed to re-run them because licence refresh
>>  was needed.
>>
>>  The report:
>>  https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-73.html
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>  - Anton
>>
>>  13.03.2018, 16:53, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
>>>  I've started tests for 3.3.1.7
>>>
>>>  11.03.2018, 06:11, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>>>   Dear Anton,
>>>>
>>>>   can you try your test suite again against 3.3.1.7 ? I think we're
>>>>   mostly ready to release 3.3.2 this time, with its many bugs fixes
>>>>  (and
>>>>   bug fix fixes).
>>>>
>>>>   Can you also try the branch made by Robert for syntax-control + a
>>>>  copy
>>>>   of the standard readtable as default?
>>>>
>>>>   —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau
>>>>  •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>>>   Wir Mathematiker sind alle ein bisschen meschugge.
>>>>   (We mathematicans are all a bit crazy). — Lev Landau