Impact on modifying the current planning code (was Re: Plans for ASDF 3.3)
evenson at panix.com
Thu May 4 15:52:04 UTC 2017
On 5/4/17 17:08, Faré wrote:
> Dear Mark,
> thanks for your request. I'm not sure I understand how your ASDF
> dependencies do or don't map to MVN entities, though. I also don't
> understand the maven model very well.
> In case (a), it probably should be a special subclass of SYSTEM. In
> case (b) a component with a single file pathname should be fine. In
> case (c) I would probably also have some subclass of SYSTEM do it, and
> use one or many secondary systems.
Exactly what I needed to know. I'll rebase my inheritance off of
ASDF:SYSTEM instead of ASDF:COMPONENT, working off your 'plan' branch.
More questions when I have an implementation to kick around…
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> Anyone who says he can see through women is missing a lot. — Groucho Marx
"A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there
is nothing to compare to it now."
More information about the asdf-devel