Discussions about merge request 3
rpgoldman at sift.net
Sat Sep 24 18:39:44 UTC 2016
On 9/24/16 Sep 24 -11:27 AM, Faré wrote:
> I think it's ready for merge — actually, of much higher quality than
> the patches I or you usually commit.
> I might would recommend splitting off %run-program and putting it in
> backward-driver, but that can be done as a further pass.
OK. I'm running the tests now on this branch on my Mac. I'll see if I
can get someone to run on Windows (or if I can get VNC to work and do it
I'm not worried about Linux, since Elias's tests are much more thorough
than my own on that platform (with the exception that I have licensed
full copies of ACL and LW).
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> It has been my observation that most people get ahead during the time
> that others waste. — Henry Ford
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
>> Elias requests we merge this sooner, rather than later, as he has to go
>> off-line for several days. I'll try to get this done tomorrow, but my
>> review will probably be sub-ideal, since I really am not fully on top of
>> this very complex chunk of code (aside from the tests, I've only really
>> used it on SBCL and ACL).
>> I'd particularly like feedback from Faré, obviously, and opinions about
>> whether it's ready for a merge.
More information about the asdf-devel