Discussions about merge request 3

[Robert Goldman]

On 9/24/16 Sep 24 -11:27 AM, Faré wrote:
> I think it's ready for merge — actually, of much higher quality than
> the patches I or you usually commit.
> 
> I might would recommend splitting off %run-program and putting it in
> backward-driver, but that can be done as a further pass.

OK. I'm running the tests now on this branch on my Mac.  I'll see if I
can get someone to run on Windows (or if I can get VNC to work and do it
myself).

I'm not worried about Linux, since Elias's tests are much more thorough
than my own on that platform (with the exception that I have licensed
full copies of ACL and LW).

Best,
r

> 
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> It has been my observation that most people get ahead during the time
> that others waste. — Henry Ford
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
>> Elias requests we merge this sooner, rather than later, as he has to go
>> off-line for several days.  I'll try to get this done tomorrow, but my
>> review will probably be sub-ideal, since I really am not fully on top of
>> this very complex chunk of code (aside from the tests, I've only really
>> used it on SBCL and ACL).
>>
>> I'd particularly like feedback from Faré, obviously, and opinions about
>> whether it's ready for a merge.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> r
>>