Test results

[Robert Goldman]

On 9/13/16 Sep 13 -2:50 AM, Elias Pipping wrote:
>>> >> - SBCL 1.1.13 now fails plenty of tests (11 to be precise). SBCL 1.3.9 and later are fine(++)
>> > 
>> > The last time I checked SBCL 1.3.9 (really a candidate for release), it
>> > failed because of some pathname-printing code. Passes for me now on Mac
>> > and Linux.
> That was a regression that they fixed prior to the 1.3.9 release, fortunately. I just wanted to point out here that so far rather old sbcl releases worked perfectly well and now they don’t. Might be worth investigating what changed.
> 

Do you have any error logs you could post?  For example to launchpad?

WRT mkcl, I'm going to let this slide.  I am already tracking it from
git, which I don't do for most other implementations.x I can't afford
the complexity of tracking multiple git repositories.  According to the
page at common-lisp.net, the gitlab repository is the official one, so I
will stick to that.

So my understanding of what needs investigation is:

1. What's going on with the new Windows failures.

2. What's going on with the newly introduced issues on older versions of
SBCL.

Best,
r