ASDF 126.96.36.199 is 3.2 release candidate
avodonosov at yandex.ru
Mon Dec 26 00:01:36 UTC 2016
I"ve generated another report where CFFI-TOOLCHAIN errors are filtered out:
What do you think of the remaining errors?
26.12.2016, 02:28, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
> This is a bug I introduced in cffi-toolchain, where the conditional
> asdf-compat file breaks the chain of :serial t when it is not defined
> because the implementation already has a recent enough asdf.
> I sent a pull request for CFFI: https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/111
> Please use that, too :-(
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
> — H. L. Mencken
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> 25.12.2016, 21:34, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>> What I meant is that SBCL 1.1.10 is over three years old. Should we really
>> be supporting anything older than two or three years?
>> I personally don't know - my job is to report.
>> The "no package with name "CFFI-TOOLCHAIN" error hapens on ECL 16.1.2. -
>> quite new one. CC Daniel Kochmanski.
>> I've reprinted the report with lisp name on every row in case too many rows
>> fall under the same value of lisp implementation, to make it easier to see
>> what lisp was used:
More information about the asdf-devel