ASDF is 3.2 release candidate

Anton Vodonosov avodonosov at
Mon Dec 26 00:01:36 UTC 2016

I"ve generated another report where CFFI-TOOLCHAIN errors are filtered out:

What do you think of the remaining errors?

26.12.2016, 02:28, "Faré" <fahree at>:
> This is a bug I introduced in cffi-toolchain, where the conditional
> asdf-compat file breaks the chain of :serial t when it is not defined
> because the implementation already has a recent enough asdf.
> I sent a pull request for CFFI:
> Please use that, too :-(
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
>        — H. L. Mencken
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at> wrote:
>>  25.12.2016, 21:34, "Faré" <fahree at>:
>>  What I meant is that SBCL 1.1.10 is over three years old. Should we really
>>  be supporting anything older than two or three years?
>>  I personally don't know - my job is to report.
>>  The "no package with name "CFFI-TOOLCHAIN" error hapens on ECL 16.1.2. -
>>  quite new one. CC Daniel Kochmanski.
>>  I've reprinted the report with lisp name on every row in case too many rows
>>  fall under the same value of lisp implementation, to make it easier to see
>>  what lisp was used:
>>  file:///home/anton/my/prj/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid2/reports-generated/asdf/asdf-diff-52.html

More information about the asdf-devel mailing list