ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate

[Faré]

This is a bug I introduced in cffi-toolchain, where the conditional
asdf-compat file breaks the chain of :serial t when it is not defined
because the implementation already has a recent enough asdf.

I sent a pull request for CFFI: https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/111

Please use that, too :-(

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
       — H. L. Mencken


On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>
> 25.12.2016, 21:34, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>
> What I meant is that SBCL 1.1.10 is over three years old. Should we really
> be supporting anything older than two or three years?
>
> I personally don't know - my job is to report.
>
> The "no package with name "CFFI-TOOLCHAIN" error hapens on ECL 16.1.2. -
> quite new one. CC Daniel Kochmanski.
>
> I've reprinted the report with lisp name on every row in case too many rows
> fall under the same value of lisp implementation, to make it easier to see
> what lisp was used:
> file:///home/anton/my/prj/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid2/reports-generated/asdf/asdf-diff-52.html