Suggestions for procedure going forward

[Stelian Ionescu]

On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 11:11 -0600, Robert Goldman wrote:
> We have had a number of ASDF 3 releases that have mostly been aimed at
> bug-fixing (although some new features have crept in).
> 
> I'd like to declare ASDF 3 feature complete and done, but I don't want
> to close the door to future bug fix releases as needed, nor do I want to
> shove incomplete new features out in order to get bug fixes out.

One suggestion I have before doing that is to remove the whole upgrading
mechanism. The purpose of it was to allow loading ASDF3 over ASDF 1/2
when the various implementations were only shipping with the latter, but
IMO it's now just a burden.

-- 
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20151117/91c9e691/attachment.sig>