[asdf-devel] Make the CL syntax predictable

[Faré]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> The tests on 3.1.0.94 have completed.
>
> No regressions detected, here is the report:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-37.html
>
> The only failure is teepeedee2, which fails because of its own problem
> - it includes in its source code libraries like babel, incompatible
> with babel from quicklisp.
>
> The lisps tested:
>  abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86
>  abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86
>  ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86
>  clisp-2.49-unix-x86
>  cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
>  sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
>
> I am now preparing to test the patch. Fare, you say on the lates
> SBCL, therefore I have build sbcl-1.1.16. Will test on it.
>
Thanks a lot! The quality of ASDF releases just wouldn't be the same
without you.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Demand Truly Free Health Care: where doctors need neither pay, food, sleep
nor training, and hospitals grow on trees!