[asdf-devel] Alternate default lisp system location
Robert P. Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.info
Wed Mar 12 14:26:33 UTC 2014
Attila Lendvai wrote:
>> to expose so a :tree recursion there would be very annoying. And please
>> don't tell me to :ignore-inherited-configuration, for what's the point
>> of the default configuration if so many people either don't use it or
>> have to explicitly ignore it ?
> well, for now it's two hard-core hackers, for whom it's probably
> marginal to get things back on track *if* it actually breaks something
> for them.
> but we have no idea about the number of newcomers who fire up an
> apt-get install sbcl for the first time in their lives, and just want
> to try a piece of code copied from the net...
> i still remember how goddamn high the fence was to first climb in to
> the CL+emacs garden. i'm with Robert on this.
> i'm not sure how the defaults would help on this, though. probably a
> very slick quicklisp experience has more value than any of these
> defaults can create.
For the record, I agree with this. I believe that installing quicklisp
is probably the best first step. But see my earlier discussion about
Clojure. I just want to start playing around in a repl, stashing some
code into files as I go. Please make this as easy for me as possible,
and don't make me grok extra stuff.
I *will* ponder adding some introduction to Quicklisp to the ASDF
manual, though. I think for lots of people that will be the easiest
path into CL, and there's no reason we should pretend not to know about
it in our documentation.
More information about the asdf-devel