[asdf-devel] Pushed version -- first version with checks for OPERATION subclasses -- please test!

Stelian Ionescu sionescu at cddr.org
Wed Jan 22 15:33:45 UTC 2014

On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 21:27 +0600, Attila Lendvai wrote:
> > For the record, I still think this intentional breakage is a bad idea.
> > In the short term, it causes a known inconvenience
> FTR, i pulled asdf when i saw the request for testing, tried to build
> our stuff, saw that iolib failed (a dependency), and then i decided to
> git reset and stay there until others struggle through this, even
> though we also have some operation subclasses.

FWIW, on my machine IOlib HEAD compiles using ASDF HEAD.

Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20140122/1a27963e/attachment.sig>

More information about the asdf-devel mailing list