[asdf-devel] The issue at hand

[Anton Vodonosov]

27.01.2014, 11:04, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>
> Anton: can you run cl-test-grid against that?
> If you have time, also try with (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check)
> and also try with :uiop in the :use list of :asdf-user.


I have results for ASDF 3.1.0.63 for these lisps:
 
 abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86
 ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86
 clisp-2.49-unix-x86
 cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86
 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode
 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
 sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86

No regressions found so far.

The report:
http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-28.html

It compares the ASDF 3.1.0.63 results to the results with
original ASDF versions coming with these lisps, on quicklisp 2013-12-13.
All the failures we see here were discussed previously, they are not ASDF
problems (quicklisp bug + the strange CCL:SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS on CCL
when building cl-l10n).

I am running more tests, will follow up here when results are ready.

Best regards,
- Anton