[asdf-devel] The issue at hand

[Faré]

Thanks a lot Anton.

Robert, is there any blocker to release?

Anton, would you have time to run the tests with the deferred-warnings
enabled? With :uiop in the use-list of :asdf-user?

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before.


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 27.01.2014, 11:04, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Anton: can you run cl-test-grid against that?
>> If you have time, also try with (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check)
>> and also try with :uiop in the :use list of :asdf-user.
>
>
> I have results for ASDF 3.1.0.63 for these lisps:
>
>  abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86
>  ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86
>  clisp-2.49-unix-x86
>  cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode
>  ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c
>  sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
>
> No regressions found so far.
>
> The report:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-28.html
>
> It compares the ASDF 3.1.0.63 results to the results with
> original ASDF versions coming with these lisps, on quicklisp 2013-12-13.
> All the failures we see here were discussed previously, they are not ASDF
> problems (quicklisp bug + the strange CCL:SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS on CCL
> when building cl-l10n).
>
> I am running more tests, will follow up here when results are ready.
>
> Best regards,
> - Anton