[asdf-devel] Re: ASDF 3.0.3 released

[Faré]

Warnings during tests are OK.

These particular warnings are relatively recent (definitely something
from the asdf3 days), but are not damning. ASDF 3 has learned to work
around a whole lot of weirdness in the way implementations handle
pathnames (or fail to handle them, as it all too often happens).

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Your conscience never stops you from doing anything.  It just stops you
from enjoying it.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> writes:
>
>     Robert> Dear Lisp hackers,
>     Robert> I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.26.
>     Robert> Since previous release 2.25, the changes are as follows:
>
> I assume you really meant 3.0.3 and not 2.26. :-)
>
> I ran the tests and they all passed.  However, I noticed there were
> some warnins such as the one appended below.  I don't remember if
> these happened before or not.
>
> Ray
>
>
> Testing: test-utilities.script
> cmulisp -noinit -batch -eval "'(#.(load(string'|script-support.lisp|))#.(asdf-test::load-asdf)#.(asdf-test::frob-packages)#.(asdf-test::with-test()(load(string'|test-utilities.script|))))"
> ; Loading #P"/Volumes/share2/src/clnet/asdf/test/script-support.lisp".
> ; Loading #P"/Volumes/share2/src/clnet/asdf/build/fasls/cmucl/asdf.sse2f".
> Configuring ASDF
> Enabling debugging
> Being a bit verbose
> Comparing directories
> ASDF-TEST:*TEST-DIRECTORY* and ASDF-TEST::X both evaluate to same path:
>   #P"/Volumes/share2/src/clnet/asdf/test/"
> Frob packages
> ; Loading #P"/Volumes/share2/src/clnet/asdf/test/test-utilities.script".
> Warning:  These two expressions yield pathname-equal yet not equal path
> the first expression (NTH 0
>                           (SPLIT-NATIVE-PATHNAMES-STRING
>                            (JOIN-NAMESTRINGS '("foo" "bar")))) yields this:
>   #P"foo"
>   (:HOST "" :DEVICE NIL :DIRECTORY NIL :NAME "foo" :TYPE :UNSPECIFIC :VERSION
>    NIL)
>
>         the other expression (NTH 0 '(#P"foo" #P"bar")) yields that:
>   #P"foo"
>   (:HOST "" :DEVICE NIL :DIRECTORY NIL :NAME "foo" :TYPE NIL :VERSION NIL)
>
>
>
>