[asdf-devel] 3.0.3 release plans

Stelian Ionescu sionescu at cddr.org
Tue Oct 8 07:29:34 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:49 -0400, Faré wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:
> > I was hoping to release this past week, but was unable to get further
> > testing done.
> >
> > Before releasing, I try to test a number of large systems that we use
> > here at SIFT with the latest ASDF.  This provides a real world add-on to
> > the test suite.  Unfortunately, I have not had a chance to make this
> > test.  I hope to do so in the next couple of days.
> >
> > That should either reveal bugs, or lead to an immediate release of 3.0.3.
> >
> > It would be great if the quicklisp issues could be resolved
> > satisfactorily in time for 3.0.3.
> >
> I took the liberty of committing as 3.0.2.12 a patch that will
> hopefully fix the issue raised by Zach and blocking adoption by
> Quicklisp: before to load the asd for foo/bar, asdf will try to load
> the asd for foo, and so extensions to
> *system-definition-search-functions* don't have to explicitly know
> about that for the magic to happen.
> 
> Zach, can you test at your leisure whether this satisfies you?
> 
> I also added a utility ensure-gethash, some docstrings, and tweaked
> the webpage and manual.

What if foo.asd doesn't define system "foo" ? The current system allows
it.

-- 
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20131008/488da409/attachment.sig>


More information about the asdf-devel mailing list