[asdf-devel] An upgrade path for checking deferred-warnings

[Faré]

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Attila Lendvai <attila.lendvai at gmail.com> wrote:
>> it is time that I declare this simultaneous change
>> towards checking deferred
>> warnings as a failure.
>
>
> i haven't experimented much with this infrastructure, so take it with
> a piece of salt... but maybe there's a middle ground, where the new
> warnings get printed but the load/compile is not forced to fail? or
> that's the case already?
>
Well, the checking obeys *compile-file-warnings-behaviour*
and *compile-file-failure-behaviour*, so it will only cause the build to fail
when there is a full warning, on SBCL and MKCL.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
In a five year period we can get one superb programming language.
Only we can't control when the five year period will begin. — Alan Perlis