[asdf-devel] Problems with asdf:load-system :force

[Stelian Ionescu]

On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 14:04 -0400, Faré wrote:
> Yes, this is probably a bug. In register-system-definition, we should
> get the force argument, and propagate to a variant of load-systems
> that itself should take keyword arguments, and is called by
> load-systems.

I gather you're talking about the first issue. What about the second
one ?

> Regarding swap-bytes, there may (or may not) be useful stuff in
> sb-rotate-bytes and nibbles.

swap-bytes is a complement to sb-rotate-bytes and nibbles does something
completely different.

-- 
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20130726/7b4f4f60/attachment.sig>