fahree at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 18:24:58 UTC 2012
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
>> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>>> sb-md5 hasn't been modified in years, but it depends on sb-rotate-byte
>>> which was just tweaked because of :if-component-dep-fails.
>>> ASDF used to not propagate timestamps from system to system,
>>> or from .asd file to the system internals, but now it does both,
>>> and so the change in sb-rotate-byte.asd now causes sb-md5
>>> to be out of date.
>>> stassats tells me SBCL usually does a clean.sh as the first thing in make.sh,
>>> so if you built with make.sh instead of slam.sh, and didn't update your
>>> source in between make.sh and install.sh, there should be not have
>>> been an issue.
>> Ok, I updated to the latest SBCL sources, did this:
>> sh clean.sh
>> sh make.sh
>> sudo sh install.sh
>> Then I change to the ASDF directory and do this:
>> sbcl --non-interactive --no-userinit --load asdf.lisp --eval "(require :sb-md5)"
>> I still get the permission error.
>> Did I miss a step?
> No, you're not missing anything. That's weird: I tried, and it worked for me.
> Can you attach a trace of this?
> (trace asdf::visit-action asdf::compute-action-stamp
> asdf::safe-file-write-date) (asdf:traverse (make-instance
> 'asdf:load-op) (asdf:find-system :sb-md5))
Oh: It work for me in SLIME but I can reproduce the issue with your
I'll investigate some more. My apologies for the frustration.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man who lives fully is
prepared to die at any time. — Mark Twain
More information about the asdf-devel