[asdf-devel] ECL patches
fahree at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 22:04:01 UTC 2011
OK, so Robert pushed something as 2.017.3, and I made a few
adjustments as 2.017.4.
Juanjo, can you test whether this satisfies you?
Regarding ECL, do fasls have a different extension when using the
bytecode compiler than when using the normal compiler? I hope so and
suppose so. Otherwise there will be an "interesting" issue of having
to reset asdf:implementation-string when switching compiler.
(Also, port install ecl failed on a MacOS 10.6.8 machine. But 2.017.4
passes ASDF tests on ECL on a Linux x64 box.)
Thanks a lot for your support, and sorry for the delay!
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:02, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:
> I have incorporated Juanjo's patches, together with my slight
> modification, and tested them on Mac OS X against:
> ACL modern
> ... and it passes all of these tests.
> So I am pushing a new ASDF version (2.017.2).
> Juanjo, will you please test this ASAP? Also, will anyone who has a
> linux box set up with all the latest and greatest lisp releases give it
> a whirl? I will test on 64-bit ACL there, and a slightly-old SBCL.
More information about the asdf-devel