[asdf-devel] ECL patches

[Faré]

OK, so Robert pushed something as 2.017.3, and I made a few
adjustments as 2.017.4.

Juanjo, can you test whether this satisfies you?

Regarding ECL, do fasls have a different extension when using the
bytecode compiler than when using the normal compiler? I hope so and
suppose so. Otherwise there will be an "interesting" issue of having
to reset asdf:implementation-string when switching compiler.

(Also, port install ecl failed on a MacOS 10.6.8 machine. But 2.017.4
passes ASDF tests on ECL on a Linux x64 box.)

Thanks a lot for your support, and sorry for the delay!

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org




On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:02, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:
> I have incorporated Juanjo's patches, together with my slight
> modification, and tested them on Mac OS X against:
>
> ACL
> ACL modern
> ABCL
> CCL
> CLISP
> SBCL
>
> ... and it passes all of these tests.
>
> So I am pushing a new ASDF version (2.017.2).
>
> Juanjo, will you please test this ASAP?  Also, will anyone who has a
> linux box set up with all the latest and greatest lisp releases give it
> a whirl?  I will test on 64-bit ACL there, and a slightly-old SBCL.
>
> Cheers,
> r