[asdf-devel] ASDF traverse changed behavior?

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info> wrote:

>
> OTOH, it's probably a good idea to figure out the implications of such a
> rule on true extensions, so I don't think James's attentions here are
> wasted.
>

Me neither, I just wanted to emphasize that it is not a one-sided change --
something in ASDF would have to be redesigned to allow forced traversal of
the full tree.

Sorry if I sounded too categorical, but my statements were produced in the
asdf-as-of-today context.

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://tream.dreamhosters.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100318/0139a77d/attachment.html>