[asdf-devel] ASDF traverse changed behavior?

[james anderson]

On 2010-03-18, at 00:03 , Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll  
> <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Oh, there is nothing with TRAVERSE's output _right now_.
>
> Let me clarify this again:
>
> - The fact that TRAVERSE now adds the same operation for all  
> components was new. That was my source of confusion. Before this  
> did not happen with LIB-OP and the like. Maybe a straightforrwad  
> solution is just writing
>
>    (defun perform ((o bundle-op) (c component)) nil)
>
> so that all components which are not modules get a default PERFORM  
> that does nothing. Is this safe?

if the library adopts an ansi-11.1.2.1.2-like restriction on  
extensions, this would be compatible, because one of the specializers  
is not a standard class.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100318/5e73a7b9/attachment.html>