[asdf-devel] ASDF testing

[Faré]

What is your first argument to run-tests.sh?
Did you modify run-tests.sh to support it? See the case "$lisp" statement.

Please pull the latest git, it has some additional sanity checking.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
The problem with most conspiracy theories is that they seem to believe that
for a group of people to behave in a way detrimental to the common good
requires intent.

The problem with most statist theories is that they seem to believe that
for a group of people to behave in a way beneficial to the common good
requires intent.





On 27 February 2010 19:02, David McClain <dbm at refined-audiometrics.com> wrote:
> Ahhh... yes, in doing my manual test, I discovered that the submitted -eval
> argument needs to be a string.
> Furthermore, when I modify your script with 'echo' so that I can examine
> what is being performed, here are the results:
>
> ;; Script as modified in the 4th line..
> do_tests() {
>   command=$1 eval=$2 fasl_ext=$3
>   rm -f *.$fasl_ext ~/.cache/common-lisp/"`pwd`"/*.$fasl_ext || true
>   ( cd .. && echo $command $eval "(load \"test/compile-asdf.lisp\")" )
>   if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
>     echo "Compiled OK"
>     test_count=0
>
> bash-3.2$ test/run-tests.sh lwm64
> (load "test/compile-asdf.lisp")  <<---- AHA! Wrong!
> Compiled OK
> Testing: *.script
> test/run-tests.sh: line 69: (load "*.script"): command not found
> Using  , *.script failed
> -#---------------------------------------
> Using
> Ran 1 tests:
>   0 passing and 1 failing
> failing test(s):  *.script
> -#---------------------------------------
> bash-3.2$
>
> So $command, $eval, and $fasl_ext must not be getting set properly
>
> On Feb 27, 2010, at 16:54 PM, David McClain wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
> I don't have a problem dealing with LW. But I want to have them work on
> things that are within their purview.
> The script problem is being reported by Bash, not LWM. The environment is
> Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard).
> I can invoke LWM from a command line just fine, including passing an initial
> SExpr for eval. Here is a direct example, performed in Emacs in Shell mode:
> bash-3.2$ lwm64 -siteinit - -init - -eval "(print :hello)"
> LispWorks(R): The Common Lisp Programming Environment
> Copyright (C) 1987-2009 LispWorks Ltd.  All rights reserved.
> Version 6.0.0
> Saved by dbmcclain as lwm64, at 27 Feb 2010 6:37
> User dbmcclain on RoadKill.local
> :HELLO
> CL-USER 1 >
> So the problem is one of the script in getting Bash to properly interpret
> the synthesized command.
>
> Dr. David McClain
> dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>
> Dr. David McClain
> dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>
>