[asdf-devel] new asdf does not like matlisp.asd

[Robert Goldman]

traverse returns a plan, which is a list (ordered sequence) of op - component dotted pairs. Effectively, we can execute the plan by mapping PERFORM over it.

This is strictly from memory. Hth.

"Faré" <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:

>Ahem. I admit this is a part of ASDF I am not familiar with.
>
>What does traverse return? Can you trace every exported defgeneric in
>ASDF and attach to a launchpad bug traces of what happens in either
>ASDF 1 or ASDF 2?
>
>Sorry I'm not being very helpful.
>
>[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
> \|/ ____ \|/
> ~@-/ oO \-@~
> /_( \__/ )_\
>    \__U_/
>
>
>
>
>On 9 April 2010 23:45, Mario S. Mommer <m_mommer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>>> Does it work better with ASDF 1.672? If not, you might have to define
>>> some method for operation-done-p or some such.
>>
>> No, unfortunately it does not work better.
>>
>> And operation-done-p is returning T's and NIL's with the new asdf as
>> well as with the one packaged with sbcl, but the latter simply does not
>> take that as a reason to recompile the lisp files, while the former
>> does, or recompiles them for some other reason.
>>
>> Regards,
>>        Mario
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> asdf-devel mailing list
>> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>asdf-devel mailing list
>asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
>http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.