[asdf-devel] new asdf does not like matlisp.asd

[Faré]

Ahem. I admit this is a part of ASDF I am not familiar with.

What does traverse return? Can you trace every exported defgeneric in
ASDF and attach to a launchpad bug traces of what happens in either
ASDF 1 or ASDF 2?

Sorry I'm not being very helpful.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
 \|/ ____ \|/
 ~@-/ oO \-@~
 /_( \__/ )_\
    \__U_/




On 9 April 2010 23:45, Mario S. Mommer <m_mommer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Faré <fahree at gmail.com> writes:
>> Does it work better with ASDF 1.672? If not, you might have to define
>> some method for operation-done-p or some such.
>
> No, unfortunately it does not work better.
>
> And operation-done-p is returning T's and NIL's with the new asdf as
> well as with the one packaged with sbcl, but the latter simply does not
> take that as a reason to recompile the lisp files, while the former
> does, or recompiles them for some other reason.
>
> Regards,
>        Mario
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>