[asdf-devel] summary proposal for COMMON_LISP_PATH and system search changes
james.anderson at setf.de
Tue Sep 29 15:48:06 UTC 2009
On 2009-09-29, at 17:20 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> james anderson wrote:
>> On 2009-09-29, at 16:09 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>>> Possible happy compromise: allow a convention like
>>> to specify when you want recursion in the variable?
>>> That works for the shell variable, which is a string; not sure
>>> how to
>>> mark the corresponding CL pathname object.
>> how about "**". as in,
> WFM. Is there any chance that this choice would cause awkwardness
> the shell's parsing?
there is always
which evil is less?
More information about the asdf-devel