[asdf-devel] summary proposal for COMMON_LISP_PATH and system search changes
rpgoldman at sift.info
Tue Sep 29 15:20:19 UTC 2009
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-09-29, at 16:09 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>> Possible happy compromise: allow a convention like
>> to specify when you want recursion in the variable?
>> That works for the shell variable, which is a string; not sure how to
>> mark the corresponding CL pathname object.
> how about "**". as in,
WFM. Is there any chance that this choice would cause awkwardness with
the shell's parsing?
More information about the asdf-devel