[asdf-devel] I think new ASDF has busted asdf-binary-locations
james.anderson at setf.de
Wed Sep 9 13:13:09 UTC 2009
i recall, that we have started down this path before, but we never
got very far, so i would like to pick up the thread again:
what exactly fails (or is just inconsistent) in the respective
logical pathname implementations to preclude accomplishing the same
thing with logical pathnames?
whatever that may be, why is it better to re-implement the
functionality for asdf rather than to fix the problem?
On 2009-09-09, at 14:39 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> Gary King wrote:
>> (cc'd to list)
>> Damn. The function disappeared recently (by my hand). I didn't
>> (obviously) that it was used. I'll fix.
> Maybe this would be a good time to push A-B-L into the ASDF
> I've always been in favor of this, acnyway, since it's such a
> extension. IMO it would be great if anyone who had ASDF could also
> A-B-L with no more work than a call to asdf:oos.
>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>>> I just updated, and now can't start up lisp because
>>> asdf-binary-locations calls ASDF::RESOLVE-SYMLINKS which seems to
>>> vanished from asdf.lisp.
>>> Any insight?
>> Gary Warren King, metabang.com
>> Cell: (413) 559 8738
>> Fax: (206) 338-4052
>> gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
More information about the asdf-devel