[armedbear-devel] test results for 1.2.0-dev

[Anton Vodonosov]

24.03.2013, 14:44, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
> But on the XPATH issue, I'm mostly very happy to know we've found and solved a compiler stability issue in light of compiling sources with shared structure.

Speaking of compiler stability issues, consider fixing the :CRASH results I've reported earlier:

23.03.2013, 01:35, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
> To give you sense of ABCL progress, here is the report comparing
> ABCL 1.1.1 on two quicklisps: 2013-02-17 and 2013-03-12:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff4.html
>
> As you see, much more libraries compile OK in new quicklisp.
>
> Note, these two quicklisps were tested on different machines,
> and the later quicklisp was tested with absence of gcc.
> This explains failure of cl-gss for example, which can be ignored.
>
> Pay attention to some CRASH results in new quicklisp. These crashes
> reproduce in 1.2.0-dev too and are caused by various errors in ABCL
> (like index out of bounds, assertion failed).
>
> Command line to reproduce it at the cl-test-grid.cloud.efficito.com machine,
> as user testgrid:
>
>     rm -r .cache/common-lisp/
>     java -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m -jar /home/testgrid/lisps/abcl/dist/abcl.jar --noinit --nosystem --batch --eval '(require :abcl-contrib)' --load /home/testgrid/quicklisp/setup.lisp --eval '(ql:quickload :cl-l10n)' > log 2>&1
>

IMHO, those crashes are likely to be low hanging fruis, errors like
"assert failed" or "index out of bounds" may be caused by some little typos.

Best regards,
- Anton