[armedbear-devel] EXT:URL-PATHNAME vs http: as a logical pathname

Mark Evenson evenson at panix.com
Wed Aug 14 10:07:44 UTC 2013

On Aug 14, 2013, at 0056 , Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
> [] URL-PATHNAME objects are actually supposed to be strictly defined
> as a [URI][1], which we can distinguish by having a "/" immediately
> after the ":" so I think we are in good shape to implement this in
> a sane manner that covers all possible cases, not those just with
> "http" and "https" schemas.

err "schemes" not "schemas".

"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."

More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list