[armedbear-devel] EXT:URL-PATHNAME vs http: as a logical pathname

[Mark Evenson]

On Aug 14, 2013, at 0056 , Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote:
> 
> [] URL-PATHNAME objects are actually supposed to be strictly defined
> as a [URI][1], which we can distinguish by having a "/" immediately
> after the ":" so I think we are in good shape to implement this in
> a sane manner that covers all possible cases, not those just with
> "http" and "https" schemas.
> 

err "schemes" not "schemas".

--
"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."