[armedbear-devel] Other findings (was Re: Questions about r14452 (Fix cl-cont))

[Erik Huelsmann]

> Well, to some extent I can see your problem. Indeed there seem to be no
> slots in the 'MOP:FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-OBJECT class. The
> layoutFuncallableStandardClass is what confused me, but that's indeed the
> layout of the metaclass.
>
> So, you're correct that the fix works by accident. The solution should be
> to add a slot by the name 'MOP::NAME to the FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-OBJECT.
> That slot can contain the name of the object (ie function) for which the
> item is defined. In that case, we should probably remove the direct slot
> MOP::NAME on the standard generic function, since it's already defined on
> the superclass if we decide to do that.
>
>

While studying this problem using DESCRIBE, it seems our current
implementation dispatches (DESCRIBE (MAKE-INSTANCE
'CL-CONT::FUNCALLABLE/CC)) the wrong way: to the T way instead of the
STANDARD-OBJECT way...

Yet more to investigate...

Bye,

Erik.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-devel/attachments/20130402/0a98f1be/attachment.html>