[armedbear-devel] Changes to CHANGES

[dmiles@users.sourceforge.net]

Ville, yes correct.

this seems to fix it



diff -r 782582237d7c src/org/armedbear/lisp/with-standard-io-syntax.lisp
--- a/src/org/armedbear/lisp/with-standard-io-syntax.lisp
+++ b/src/org/armedbear/lisp/with-standard-io-syntax.lisp
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
        (*print-level* nil)
        (*print-lines* nil)
        (*print-miser-width* nil)
+        (*print-pprint-dispatch* (copy-pprint-dispatch nil))
        (*print-pretty* nil)
        (*print-radix* nil)
        (*print-readably* t)



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 February 2010 20:20, dmiles at users.sourceforge.net
> <logicmoo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is it known when the WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX.23 regression started?
>
> I thought (and said to Mark) that it shouldn't fail - I was obviously
> wrong, it's a new test
> that I didn't have. I updated my ansi-tests and it does indeed fail.
> We need to test
> it on abcl 0.17 (as an example) to verify that it's old, but according
> to our investigations
> it looks like it's a matter of our with-standard-io-syntax failing to
> restore (or lexically bind)
> the pprint-dispatch table to the standard value.
>