[Admin] hosting the UBF-in-CL project

[Mario Mommer]

Erik Enge <erik at nittin.net> writes:
> Miles Egan <miles at caddr.com> writes:
> 
> > Obvious seems better than precise in this case.
> 
> Heh, yeah, exactly, and to my ear "rfc2822" is obvious whereas "internet
> message format" isn't.  Ah, a classic problem this.  :-)
[...]
> So, is our plan so far: cl- for wrappers around libraries; proper nouns
> are preferable; RFCs use a shortned version of their title?

Sounds good so far, except that I don't know if that is too inflexible
for rfcs.

I tried to find some guidelines at sourceforge, but found none. Any
ideas how they deal with this? And savvannah?

Regards,
        Mario.