[Admin] hosting the UBF-in-CL project
Miles Egan
miles at caddr.com
Fri Sep 12 17:37:21 UTC 2003
erik-nittin at imeme.net wrote:
> I guess I'm being a bit stubborn. I think I see what you mean;
> you'renot suggesting that we have cl-araneida and cl-sb-sockets, but
> ratherthat proper names such as RFC 822 should be cl-rfc822 to
> indicate thatthis is not the proper thing itself but rather an
> implementation of it. Whatever the popular vote is, I'll go with it.
I definitely prefer ubf over cl-ubf. I think we should use the cl-
prefix when it's a cl wrapper of an existing library.
I also strongly dislike the rfcXXX convention. Why not use something
like "mime" or "mime-headers". The python module used to be called
rfc822 but now it's "email".
miles
More information about the Admin
mailing list