[admin] Project state-machine?

[Nikodemus Siivola]

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:05:34PM -0500, Erik Enge wrote:

> cleaner and easier to debug because of it and my question is thus: I
> have, of course, made the state-machine bits an independent library.  It
> is about 44K including documentation.  Does it warrant its own project?

I think a good state-machine library would be pretty neat thing, but
as I mentioned to Erik on irc, I think in it's current form this is
probably on the lower bound of separate-projectness.

So, approved with some reservations unless Erik is persuaded
otherwise.

 -

We really should come up with a heuristic for separate projectness. I
tried to type one up off the cuff, but it's obviously too early in the
morning. ;)

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/admin/attachments/20031125/a3ff91a9/attachment.sig>