[xuriella-devel] xuriella vs ccl

[Raymond Wiker]

I've tried using Xuriella with CCL, but have been getting errors  
related to unknown setf expanders. This has also been reported by  
others[1, 2], and the explanation appears to be that CCL needs to have  
the setf expanders defined before they are referenced. In the case of  
Xuriella, the problem appears to be that certain defstructs are placed  
after function definitions that refer to setters for elements of these  
structures.

[1] has a patch for resolving these issues, but the patch is relative  
to the code as of November 2008, and does not apply to the current  
code. I'm attaching an updated patch that works with current code.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xuriella.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2086 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/xuriella-devel/attachments/20091017/7a9f71fd/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


[1] http://www.nabble.com/Problems-compiling-Xuriella-td20528975.html
[2] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/xuriella-devel/2009-July/000000.html