From tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com Thu Jul 9 11:55:42 2009 From: tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com (Tomo Matsumoto) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:55:42 +0900 Subject: [web4r-devel] web4r v0.2.6 released Message-ID: <780e7d140907090455h52f3a3c6l9ddb074d20e9b30c@mail.gmail.com> web4r v0.2.6 is out! Changelog: http://web4r.org/en/changelog enjoy :) Tomo From tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com Tue Jul 14 05:23:22 2009 From: tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com (Tomo Matsumoto) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:23:22 +0900 Subject: [web4r-devel] web4r v0.2.7 released Message-ID: <780e7d140907132223n577ff858jdc4176e9783e2486@mail.gmail.com> web4r v0.2.7 is out! Changelog: http://web4r.org/en/changelog enjoy :) Tomo From tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com Sat Jul 18 09:32:20 2009 From: tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com (Tomo Matsumoto) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:32:20 +0900 Subject: [web4r-devel] web4r v0.2.8 released Message-ID: <780e7d140907180232g2d3e4522n9e2ecd4aa5a9f1b1@mail.gmail.com> web4r v0.2.8 is out! Changelog: http://web4r.org/en/changelog enjoy :) Tomo From tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com Sat Jul 18 09:35:00 2009 From: tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com (Tomo Matsumoto) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:35:00 +0900 Subject: [web4r-devel] Error conditions when loading web4r for the first time In-Reply-To: <780e7d140906291635o10f654day16924e8d46bf491a@mail.gmail.com> References: <780e7d140906290854w3c9500dn64a753d448b6db2@mail.gmail.com> <4a49291c.1ac1f10a.1727.ffffc852@mx.google.com> <780e7d140906291635o10f654day16924e8d46bf491a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <780e7d140907180235t5a1d6e62we6419dee1fa78f0e@mail.gmail.com> > I am planning to support more lisp implementations within a month. web4r v0.2.8 supports Allegro CL 8.1 on Linux x86 :) Tomo On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Tomo Matsumoto wrote: > Hi Harrison, > >> What platforms does web4r work best on? > > Linux + SBCL > See detail at http://web4r.org/en/install > > I am planning to support more lisp implementations within a month. The > candidates are Clozure CL and Allegro because Elephant officially > supports only those implementations. > http://common-lisp.net/project/elephant/platforms.html > >> I am not an expert programmer; I am teaching myself programming by >> writing a simple but interesting web app and I thought web4r was the >> framework to work with. > > Thanks for choosing web4r. I am really glad to hear that :) > >> From the Mudballs manual at http://mudballs.com/ : Mudballs is a "System >> Management Tool for Common Lisp. > > Looks interesting. ?I didn't know that. I will take a look at it and > consider that. Thanks for the info, Harrison. > > Tomo > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Harrison Maseko wrote: >> Thanks for your reply, Tomo. What platforms does web4r work best on? I have >> an experimental Debian installation which I sometimes play with but I am not >> that conversant with Linux. Most of the time I spend it on Windows XP and >> Vista. On Windows I have LispWorks, SBCL running via Cusp in Eclipse, and >> ACL the trial version, as well as CLISP. I think web4r looks like what I >> have been missing and I am eager to poke around to see how to get things >> done. I am not an expert programmer; I am teaching myself programming by >> writing a simple but interesting web app and I thought web4r was the >> framework to work with. >> >>> What do you mean by mudballs? >> >> From the Mudballs manual at http://mudballs.com/ : Mudballs is a "System >> Management Tool for Common Lisp. Mudballs was written with the goal of >> providing an easy to use system for loading Common Lisp code into your image >> in a reliable and predictable manner." Mudballs seeks to be a better system >> to succeed ASDF. Please check out that website for more details, especially >> this section http://mudballs.com/#everyones-system which deals with making >> your system available to others. The mailing list is at >> http://groups.google.com/group/mudballs/. I like Mudballs' ease of use and >> simple interface. You would sure make web4r easily accessible to many more >> by making it available to Mudballs and I would urge you to consider that as >> an option. >> >> Looking forward to your response. >> >> Harrison. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tomo Matsumoto [mailto:tomoyuki28jp at gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:54 PM >> To: Harrison Maseko >> Cc: web4r-devel at common-lisp.net >> Subject: Re: [web4r-devel] Error conditions when loading web4r for the first >> time >> >> Hi Harrison, >> >> Thanks for trying web4r. >> >> Unfortunately, web4r does not support LispWorks because some depending >> packages like Elephant does not support LispWorks. >> http://common-lisp.net/project/elephant/platforms.html >> >>> 2. The file #P"C:/Program Files/LispWorks Personal/Lisp >> Libraries/closure-html-2008-11-30/src/parse/unparse.ofasl" does not exist. >> >> It seems like you got this error because closure-html is not working on your >> system. >> http://common-lisp.net/project/closure/closure-html/ >> >>> QUESTION 2: Has web4r been made available to mudballs? >> >> What do you mean by mudballs? >> >> Tomo >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harrison Maseko wrote: >>> Hello web4r: >>> Running LispWorks Personal 5.0.1 on Vista, I tried to load?web4r using >>> Edi Weitz's Lisp Starter Pack for the first time ever into my Lisp >>> image and I experienced the following two hitches: >>> >>> 1. Symbol "FIND-OUTPUT-ENCODING" not found at all in the RUNES >>> package. >>> >>> 2. The file #P"C:/Program Files/LispWorks Personal/Lisp >>> Libraries/closure-html-2008-11-30/src/parse/unparse.ofasl" does not >>> exist. >>> >>> QUESTION 1: What are the consequencies of opting for "continue treating >> ... >>> [above condition] as having been successful"? In other words, what >>> components of the framework will not function properly if these >>> conditions were ignored and?what are the solutions? >>> >>> QUESTION 2: Has web4r been made available to mudballs? >>> >>> Harrison >>> _______________________________________________ >>> web4r-devel mailing list >>> web4r-devel at common-lisp.net >>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/web4r-devel >>> >>> >> Internal Virus Database is out of date. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 8.0.338 / Virus Database: 270.12.23/2106 - Release Date: 5/9/2009 >> 6:54 AM >> >> >