[usocket-devel] [drakma-devel] [patch] Resubmit drakma timeout for sbcl.

Erik Huelsmann ehuels at gmail.com
Sun Mar 27 15:20:10 UTC 2011


Hi Chun,

2011/3/27 Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>:
> Hi, Erik
>
> Could you tell me what exact timeout feature they want? Setting Read/Write timeout when doing SOCKET-CONNECT? or Apply new timeout values to exist usocket object?

As far as I understand, the request is to for SOCKET-CONNECT to be
cancelled after a certain timeout period expires. I don't think that's
a read/write timeout, but rather a way to limit the waiting time until
a valid connection is established.


Bye,


Erik.

> 在 2011-3-27,03:11, Erik Huelsmann 写道:
>
>> Hi Edi,
>>
>> 2011/3/26 Edi Weitz <edi at weitz.de>:
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Александр Литвинов <lan at academsoft.ru> wrote:
>>>>  There was the same decision at Dec 2007. Now, three years later, you
>>>> have not changed it.
>>>
>>> Well, I don't think it's too bad not to change your mind every year... :)
>>>
>>> Actually, I had hoped that there had been some development in usocket since.
>>
>> Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of
>> supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an
>> UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored,
>> everything should just continue without the timeout settings.
>>
>> If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to
>> happen to make it so?
>>
>>
>> Bye,
>>
>>
>>
>> Erik.
>
>




More information about the usocket-devel mailing list