[usocket-devel] [Patch] ns-try-again-condition is undefined.

[Chun Tian (binghe)]

Hi, Stas Boukarev

You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of "ns-try-again" as most backends does.

Fixed in trunk and earlier branches.

P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added "ns-try-again-condition" into our always-broken unit test code, so that all supported platforms could have this condition reported correctly.

Thanks,

Chun Tian (binghe)

在 2010-9-28，03:10， Stas Boukarev 写道：

> ns-try-again-condition is used in several places, but is defined as
> ns-try-again. The attached patch renames it to ns-try-again-condition.
> Index: condition.lisp
> ===================================================================
> --- condition.lisp	(revision 563)
> +++ condition.lisp	(working copy)
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
> error available."))
> 
> (define-usocket-condition-classes
> -  (ns-try-again)
> +  (ns-try-again-condition)
>   (ns-condition))
> 
> (define-condition ns-unknown-condition (ns-condition)
> Index: backend/cmucl.lisp
> ===================================================================
> --- backend/cmucl.lisp	(revision 563)
> +++ backend/cmucl.lisp	(working copy)
> @@ -209,10 +209,10 @@
>       ;; constants mentioned in C
>       (let ((exception
>              (second (assoc errno
> -                            '((1 ns-host-not-found-error) ;; HOST_NOT_FOUND
> -                              (2 ns-no-recovery-error)    ;; NO_DATA
> -                              (3 ns-no-recovery-error)    ;; NO_RECOVERY
> -                              (4 ns-try-again))))))       ;; TRY_AGAIN
> +                            '((1 ns-host-not-found-error)     ;; HOST_NOT_FOUND
> +                              (2 ns-no-recovery-error)        ;; NO_DATA
> +                              (3 ns-no-recovery-error)        ;; NO_RECOVERY
> +                              (4 ns-try-again-condition)))))) ;; TRY_AGAIN
>         (when exception
>           (error exception))))))
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards, Stas.
> _______________________________________________
> usocket-devel mailing list
> usocket-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/usocket-devel/attachments/20100928/0e8351a2/attachment.bin>