[hunchentoot-devel] Cookies?

[Peter Seibel]

Yeah, I think the cookie-in being described as returning a "cookie" is
what threw me off.

-Peter

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> wrote:
> Indeed, incoming cookies are only returned as strings and this has
> always been the case.  I understand that in theory the client could
> send path and domain attributes with the cookie, but I think in
> practice this never happens.  At least it seems nobody using
> Hunchentoot was bothered with this so far.
>
> I agree that the documentation is a bit misleading.  Although the
> chapter about cookies starts with "OUTGOING cookies [...] are CLOS
> objects" which one could construe as meaning that incoming cookies
> aren't... :)
>
> Edi.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Peter Seibel <peter at gigamonkeys.com> wrote:
>> It seems that cookie-in returns a string, not a cookie object. Is this
>> a recent change or am I misunderstanding the docs?
>>
>> -Peter
>>
>> --
>> Peter Seibel
>> http://www.codequarterly.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tbnl-devel site list
>> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>



-- 
Peter Seibel
http://www.codequarterly.com/