[hunchentoot-devel] Encoding issues in auhtorization header
Christian Haselbach
ch at mr-co.de
Wed May 14 19:10:26 UTC 2008
Edi Weitz wrote:
> My understanding of the standard is that what you are doing is wrong.
>
I guess, you are right.
> So, you'd have to add support for proper RFC 2047 parsing to make the
> function deal with this correctly. (And I'd say that that would
> probably be worth its own library, maybe based on FLEXI-STREAMS.)
>
Well, yes, looks like it. It seems to be a bit overprotective to have
something base64 encoded and then again encoded inside, which might
again use base64.
Regards,
Christian
More information about the Tbnl-devel
mailing list