[hunchentoot-devel] minor modification to HANDLE-STATIC-FILE

[Vsevolod]

That is a valid claim, I agree.
I overlooked this possibility of modifying the headers before calling
HANDLE-STATIC-FILE.

Thanks

On 12/5/08, Hans Hübner <hans at huebner.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 13:04, Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:38:10 +0200, Vsevolod <vseloved at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Than, maybe add optional parameter to HANDLE-STATIC-FILE?
>>
>> Yeah, maybe something like that.  But in that case I'd use keywords
>> and not optional arguments.
>>
>> I'm not sure if that's really so useful, though.  What do others
>> think?
>
> I think that the content disposition is application specific.  I'd not
> put it into handle-static-file.  Applications can always use their own
> handler function to set up appropriate headers, then call
> handle-static-file to do the gruntwork.
>
> -Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>


-- 
vsevolod