[hunchentoot-devel] Sessions for realm aware Realm

[Hans Hübner]

Can we get away with extending START-SESSION by a realm argument that
is added to or used instead of the *SESSION-COOKIE-NAME* to determine
the cookie name or session id parameter?

-Hans

On 4/12/08, Andrea Chiumenti <kiuma72 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not completely correct.
>
>  Suppose we want to "deploy" two applications in the same hunchentoot
>  server instance.
>  First, since they are two applications, they must have their own
>  cookie each one.
>
>
>  Now we have two options:
>  1) let them to share the same session data, then bind the two
>  applications to the same realm,
>  2) make the two applications completely independents, then bind them
>  to two different realms.
>
>  So,
>  1 request to only 1 session
>  and one session may be shared or not.
>
>  kiuma
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Hans Hübner <hans at huebner.org> wrote:
>  > On 4/12/08, Hans Hübner <hans at huebner.org> wrote:
>  >  >  if I understand your source code right, what you need is a realm
>  >  >  argument to START-SESSION that makes it possible to have multiple
>  >  >  sessions on one Hunchentoot server.  Correct?
>  >
>  >  Well, I realised that my description of the feature is not quite
>  >  right, another try:  You want to have the option to use multiple
>  >  sessions within one request, qualified by a realm argument.  Or what?
>  >  It would really help if you would describe your requirements yourself
>  >  instead of letting us guess from your example source code.
>  >
>  >  -Hans
>  >
>  >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>  >  tbnl-devel site list
>  >  tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
>  >  http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  tbnl-devel site list
>  tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
>  http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>