[hunchentoot-devel] Re: hunchentoot build error on ccl (with new version, via asdf)

[Edi Weitz]

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:26:17 -0700 (PDT), Raffaele <foobarpublic at yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> The reason I decided to upgrade was because Hunchentoot would not
> return my formatted string as the response body after setf'ing
> return-code to +http-created+.  If I did not set the return code
> (even to the default +http-ok+) Hunchentoot would return my string
> to the client.  This was in response to a POST request.

See here:

  http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#*approved-return-codes*

It is unusual to send content together with a 201 reply, but if you
want, you can do it.  RTFM... :)