[hunchentoot-devel] Virtual hosts support using *META-DISPATCHER*

[Cyrus Harmon]

Perhaps I'm missing something, but why would using *meta-dispatcher*  
be preferred to, say, just setting the server-dispatch-table? I've  
been using virtual hosts without *meta-dispatcher* and I'd like to  
minimize the global changes that would change the behavior of, say,  
other servers that one might bring up in the same instance.

Thanks,

Cyrus

On Jul 29, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Ram Krishnan wrote:

> Perfect. Thanks for the follow up.
>
> Also, thanks Edi for Hunchentoot and all the other excellent Lisp  
> packages you've contributed.
>
> Regards,
>
> -ram
>
> On 7/29/07, Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:16:57 -0700, "Ram Krishnan" <  
> rkris at kriyative.net> wrote:
>
> > Are there any problems in subverting the *META-DISPATCHER* binding
> > this way? Is there a better alternative?
>
> Looks OK to me.  That (virtual host support) was actually one of the
> reasons why *META-DISPATCHER* is there.
>
> Cheers,
> Edi.
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/attachments/20070805/02fc0070/attachment.html>